You notice. We'll keep the record.

From the goal you inherit to the report you hand over.

Omibrook is the case manager's record for the whole year. Paste the goals you were handed, get the year's evidence generated as paper you can score, and finish with a progress report that already has the samples attached.

Free for teachers — the whole caseload, no card.

One goal, start to finish. The scored sheets are the work samples — nothing is scanned or re-entered.

The year, in four moves

What is marked in build is specified and designed, not yet shipped. We would rather you read that here than find it after signing up.

The caseload you inherit

One list, sorted by what is most overdue — the screen you open at 7:40am, answering which goals have no data inside their cadence. Each student is initials and a grade band; a full name is optional, and never appears on anything printed.

To collect

most overdue first

StudentGoalDue
Reading comprehension11d late
Asks for a breakdue now
Two-digit subtractionnever
Sorted by what is most overdue, because that is the only number that changes what you do next. A goal collected on time simply drops off the list.

The goals, made measurablein build

Nobody retypes a caseload in August. Paste a goal — or the whole block you copied out of SEIS or PowerSchool — and it is split into condition, behaviour, criterion, consistency and timeline, with anything missing named in plain language rather than flagged red.

Pasted

By the end of the IEP year, when given a grade-level narrative passage, J.M. will read aloud and answer five literal comprehension questions with 80% accuracy as measured by teacher-collected data.

Parsed

Condition
Given a grade-level narrative passage
Behaviour
Reads aloud, answers five literal questions
Criterion
80% accuracy
Timeline
By the end of the IEP year
Consistency
How many trials in a row? e.g. 4 of 5 sessions
One goal or a whole caseload. What is missing is asked for in a sentence you can answer, never guessed on your behalf.

The evidence, generated

A goal says how it will be measured, and the sheets are built from that definition — eighteen of them, one per fortnight, scorable with a pen in one colour on the printer down the hall. Scoring takes ten seconds on the phone in your pocket, and a correction never overwrites a score: it is a new row that supersedes the old one, which is what makes the graph trustworthy to someone who was not in the room.

One goal, one school year: sheets 1–7 scored, 8–18 waiting in the binder. A sheet that already has scores on it is never replaced when you generate the stack again.

The report, with the samples attachedin build

Districts require work samples on the progress report, and the sheet she scored is already the sample — so there is nothing to scan in the last week of the quarter. The report drafts a paragraph per goal from the points you actually collected, and says what the data says, including when it says not yet.

Quarter 2 · J.M. · reading comprehension

draft

Across seven probes, J.M. moved from 1 of 5 comprehension questions correct to 4 of 5. The trend is upward and currently runs ahead of the aim line. The criterion asks for 4 of 5 correct across four of five consecutive sessions; that has been met once so far, so the goal continues.

Attached work samples

One click per reporting window, exported to Word or PDF for pasting into SEIS, PowerSchool or IEP Online. You edit it before it goes anywhere; nothing is sent for you.

What we hold

Initials and a grade band for each student. No date of birth, no district ID, no guardian contact — those columns do not exist in our database, so there is no setting to get wrong. Every read of your caseload happens under your identity, enforced by the database rather than by the application asking nicely, and the data is stored in the United States.

The page to forward to your tech director names every subprocessor and what each one holds.

Start with one goal and see the eighteen sheets.

About three minutes, and the PDF at the end is yours whether or not you come back.